Posted on June 2, 2008 by mssaleh
I’d be very ungrateful if I started this article with anything but thanking everyone who has read or commented on my previous post. I also appreciate all the websites who embraced my effort. At first, I was completely overwhelmed by the huge number of visits and comments—either here, on this blog, or on other websites, especially www.osnews.com . Later, when the ecstasy subsided, I started feeling a little ashamed of myself for not doing a better job. In fact, I didn’t expect my article to receive that much attention. It was just a one-man effort with very little knowledge. I would also like to thank my friend Eng. Ahmad Bakdash for his generous support.
I thoroughly read all comments and suggestions, but I was a little bit undecided about repeating the test. I was afraid of being misjudged by readers who tend to take things very seriously. I’ve always been aware that my little experience and resources will always keep me from doing a conclusive benchmark. I stated that clearly in my previous article but many readers missed it. Eventually, I couldn’t resist doing another test with some mistakes corrected to see how it would go. But again, it is nearly impossible for me to do a perfect benchmark, and it is absolutely impossible to satisfy every reader. I can only do my best.
Filed under: Linux | Tagged: benchmark, hardy, Linux, microsoft, performance, ubuntu, windows | 6 Comments »
Posted on May 10, 2008 by mssaleh
Computer working environments are pretty similar to the species on this planet. One can see ancient species, that have survived millions of years, living along some fairly-recent ones like humans. The ancient of working environments would be the famed CLI (Command Line Interface) that uses typed text to communicate with the computer, while the modern, today, is the GUI (Graphical User Interface) where there are buttons, windows, mouse pointers and clicks.
There is, surprisingly, a heated debate between each interface’s supporters. CLI pundits are usually vocal and so determined in such debates. They argue that CLI’s are more direct, powerful, safer, cleaner and more reliable than GUI’s. They suggest that using a CLI is simply like the text-chatting that we do all the time. Of course, I would say: yes, but it’s like chatting to a very strict English teacher: zero-tolerance to all mistakes in grammar and spelling. Elsewhere, GUI users (the most of us) don’t even imagine how it is possible that a CLI can be better than all these nice buttons, colourful icons and easy-to-follow informative boxes. CLI can be very intimidating for new users.
Filed under: Linux | Tagged: CLI, command-line, GUI, hardy, Linux, open source, ubuntu | 6 Comments »